Is the Paleo diet beneficial for the general public?

Home Forum Ask a Nutritionist Is the Paleo diet beneficial for the general public?

This topic contains 2 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  Ashley 10 years ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2475

    Ashley
    Participant

    Is the Paleo diet beneficial for the general public?

    #2478

    Anna
    Participant

    The mentality behind the Paleo diet is, “If our hunter-gatherer ancestors didn’t eat it, we don’t need to.” Hunter-gatherers didn’t have access to refined grains, processed foods, dairy, potatoes, salt, and refined vegetable oils (1). Say good bye to wheat, and legumes as well. If you go Paleo, you’ll eat a lot of fruits and vegetables, lean meats, and you can eat eggs, nuts and oils such as olive and coconut oil. Meat provided a large fraction of the day’s food for our ancestors, they consumed high levels of cholesterol. However, they ate less fat but consumed more essential fatty acids and a higher ratio of polyunsaturated to saturated fats than today’s current U.S. diet (1). Studies have shown that the Paleo diet can improve blood pressure, increase insulin sensitivity, and improve lipid profiles. Another study showed that the Paleo diet reduced the glucose levels of the participants by 36% (2). The Paleo diet can be more costly since the meat and produce are the more expensive foods to buy (2).

    References
    1. Eaton BS, Konner M. Paleolithic Nutrition: A consideration of Its Nature. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1985; 312(5): 283-289.
    2. Frassetto LA, Schloetter M, Mietus-Synder M, Morris RC Jr, and Sebastian A. Metabolic and Physiologic Improvements From Consuming a Paleolithic, Hunter-Gatherer Type Diet. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009; 63: 947-955.

    #2488

    Ashley
    Participant

    Anna,

    That is good to know, but what are the negative effects of paleo? A study I read compared weight loss between a control group on an average healthy diet (15% protein, 25-30% fat, 55-60% CHOs) compared to the intervention group on a paliolithic diet (40% fat, 30% protein, and 30% CHOs). The paleolithic diet was based on lean meat, fish, eggs, vegetables, fruits, berries, and nuts. There were no significant differences in the anthros at 24 months. Triglyceride levels were significantly lower in the paleo group, but the adherence to protein was poor in that group. It seems to me that the paleo is beneficial because they are sticking to the diet not because of the diet itself.

    Reference
    Mellberg C, Sandberg S, Ryberg M, et al. Long-term effects of a palaeolithic-type diet in obese postmenopausal women: a 2-year randomized trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2014;68:350-357.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.